Fried asks what determines a right (wants from needs):
[Keep in mind that any solution cannot only just be practical in theory,
but must be realistic!]
- no person is entitled to an unfair share of scarce resources
- is internet access within a person's fair share? (Fried argues that a
personUs claim to fair share is a right)
- does the fact that wealthier people naturally have an advantage (they
can afford new computers) give them more right to access? Or should they
be obligated to provide to some degree for other less fortunate members
of society?
- draw the line for satisfying people's rights when they begin to
interfere with others.
System for determining standards: Is universal access a subjective or
objective standard?
- first determine needs from wants
- needs determined by goal of necessary standard of good citizenship
(what does it take to make a person a good citizen? Do they need access
to the net for this?)
- is there some basic degree of access?
- Should a certain standard of access be guaranteed?